Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Curious question for the board

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    165

    Default Curious question for the board

    Last Thursday's Town Crier printed an allegation that Peggy Patton (who lives with Mr. Collins - one of the BO3) had done some TA contract research prior to the August 26th brutal firing of Fred T. I haven't seen any additional press on that, nor has anyone commented on it or denied it. I'm wondering if this has been pursued? Seems like it might produce the hard evidence that we're looking for to prove the OML violation?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    117

    Default

    Carl,

    Here are some more details. http://waylandenews.com/wp-content/u...2013-09-18.pdf

    Please see page 15 and 16 of the PDF for specifics.

    Ben

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    448

    Default

    Better yet, get it from the horse's mouth - http://waycamtv.pegcentral.com/playe...fc699b86f42a87
    At the last meeting, Ed Collins addresses this issue.
    John Flaherty

    Any views expressed are NOT mine alone.
    Wayland Transparency - Facts Without Spin
    http://www.waylandtransparency.com/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    117

    Default

    While I would never characterize Mr. Collins like you do, I did watch that meeting and perhaps like Mr. Collins, I dozed off or was not paying attention, but I did not hear him address the issue at all.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    165

    Default

    John - I think you got the wrong end of the horse...

    Ben - he did address it briefly in an exchange with Steve who asked him directly about it. Of course he denied knowing anything about it, and even told a story about how Peggy "chatted" with him about it in the car on the way to some meeting (I was dozing a bit myself so I don't quite remember all the boring details). In any event, I don't believe him. He tried to cover his tracks by having Peggy do his dirty work, and he got caught. Simple denial does not equate to innocence. Perhaps Peggy would be willing to go to a court of law, swear to tell the truth, and then offer an explanation for the searching she did on TA contracts. Not sure that would completely convince me, but at least it would be interesting to watch her body language.

    Resign now BO3! Resign now.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •